Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Podesta Email Shows Trump Was RIGHT!! Hillary Wants Canadian Style Single-Payer Healthcare System



  As I continue to dig through the massive amount of leaked emails in the Podesta Dump on Wikileaks I am constantly connecting dots when I find something of interest. Several news outlets have been reporting other revelations in from the email titled "HRC Paid Speeches" but they appear to have missed something.
  During the second Presidential Debate, Donald Trump made the claim that Hillary Clinton wanted a Canadian style Single-Payer Healthcare System. Well, much to the dismay of the Clinton News Network aka: CNN, a leaked Podesta Email shows that indeed Hillary Clinton in remarks to ECGR on June 17th 2013 said:

*CLINTON IS MORE FAVORABLE TO CANADIAN HEALTH CARE AND SINGLE PAYER* *Clinton Said Single-Payer Health Care Systems “Can Get Costs Down,” And “Is As Good Or Better On Primary Care,” But “They Do Impose Things Like Waiting Times.” *“If you look at countries that are comparable, like Switzerland or Germany, for example, they have mixed systems. They don't have just a single-payer system, but they have very clear controls over budgeting and accountability. If you look at the single-payer systems, like Scandinavia, Canada, and elsewhere, they can get costs down because, you know, although their care, according to statistics, overall is as good or better on primary care, in particular, they do impose things like waiting times, you know. It takes longer to get like a hip replacement than it might take here.” [Hillary Clinton remarks to ECGR Grand Rapids, 6/17/13]

And in a paid speech to tinePublic January 21st 2015 she said:

*Clinton Cited President Johnson’s Success In Establishing Medicare And Medicaid And Said She Wanted To See The U.S. Have Universal Health Care Like In Canada.* 
“You know, on healthcare we are the prisoner of our past. The way we got to develop any kind of medical insurance program was during World War II when companies facing shortages of workers began to offer healthcare benefits as an inducement for employment. So from the early 1940s healthcare was seen as a privilege connected to employment. And after the war when soldiers came back and went back into the market there was a lot of competition, because the economy was so heated up. So that model continued. And then of course our large labor unions bargained for healthcare with the employers that their members worked for. So from the early 1940s until the early 1960s we did not have any Medicare, or our program for the poor called Medicaid until President Johnson was able to get both passed in 1965. So the employer model continued as the primary means by which working people got health insurance. People over 65 were eligible for Medicare. Medicaid, which was a partnership, a funding partnership between the federal government and state governments, provided some, but by no means all poor people with access to healthcare. So what we've been struggling with certainly Harry Truman, then Johnson was successful on Medicare and Medicaid, but didn't touch the employer based system, then actually Richard Nixon made a proposal that didn't go anywhere, but was quite far reaching. Then with my husband's administration we worked very hard to come up with a system, but we were very much constricted by the political realities that if you had your insurance from your employer you were reluctant to try anything else. And so we were trying to build a universal system around the employer-based system. And indeed now with President Obama's legislative success in getting the Affordable Care Act passed that is what we've done. We still have primarily an employer-based system, but we now have people able to get subsidized insurance. So we have health insurance companies playing a major role in the provision of healthcare, both to the employed whose employers provide health insurance, and to those who are working but on their own are not able to afford it and their employers either don't provide it, or don't provide it at an affordable price. We are still struggling. We've made a lot of progress. Ten million Americans now have insurance who didn't have it before the Affordable Care Act, and that is a great step forward. (Applause.) And what we're going to have to continue to do is monitor what the costs are and watch closely to see whether employers drop more people from insurance so that they go into what we call the health exchange system. So we're really just at the beginning. But we do have Medicare for people over 65. And you couldn't, I don't think, take it away if you tried, because people are very satisfied with it, but we also have a lot of political and financial resistance to expanding that system to more people. So we're in a learning period as we move forward with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. And I'm hoping that whatever the shortfalls or the glitches have been, which in a big piece of legislation you're going to have, those will be remedied and we can really take a hard look at what's succeeding, fix what isn't, and keep moving forward to get to affordable universal healthcare coverage like you have here in Canada. [Clinton Speech For tinePublic – Saskatoon, CA, 1/21/15]

  In my personal opinion because of the time that Donald Trump has spent in New York City doing business he understand and knows some of the people that have attended some of Hillary Clinton's paid speeches and I have a feeling that he has a rather good picture of the vision she has laid out for the direction in which she wants to take this country. People must understand that even Hillary Clinton has handlers and masters and she will never represent the will of the people and she will never stand for the rights of the every day American which she despises so much.


Saturday, October 15, 2016

BREAKING: Clinton Campaign Targeted Juanita Broaddrick


  In the wake of the Wikileaks Hacked Podesta Email Leak, the internet has been working feverishly to read through the entire contents of the release. I personally have spent several hours looking through the emails and have found something quite interesting.

In an email titled "Fwd: History of Juanita Broaddrick Allegations" John Podesta forwarded an email chain between he and Clinton lawyer David E. Kendall discussing Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick with campaign heads. 

In the email dated Thursday January 7th 2016, David Kendall details four documents related to Paula Jones lawsuit against Bill Clinton in which he was forced to pay out 850,000 dollars. 

"The first is the affidavit and cover letter from her lawyer. This document makes clear that Broaddrick is indeed “Jane Doe #5” in the Paula Jones suit. I believe this has been unsealed but before we release it publicly, I’d need to check."

Apparently Juanita Broaddrick has been a hot topic inside the Clinton Camp and they have been brainstorming her eventual appearance during this election way before the second Presidential Debate in which Donald Trump completely destroyed Hillary Clinton over Bills sexual assault cases.

In this segment they claim that Juanita Broaddrick is lying about Bill Clinton raping her.

"The second is a redacted copy of the same document, deleting her name and referring to her simply as “Jane Doe #5”. This document is public. Broaddrick’s lawyers made a motion to quash her deposition subpoena, and that motion was denied, and she testified on January 9, 1998, at which time she reaffirmed the accuracy of her affidavit. I can’t locate a copy of the deposition, but I’ve called up my files on the case. According to the Office of Independent Counsel’s description of it, Broaddrick not only reaffirmed her affidavit, “[s]he testified that if she previously had said that the President had sexually assaulted her, ’it was untrue.’” (Starr Report appendices, Vol. 1, p. 80 [not attached hereto])."

They also try to claim that she lied in a third document

"The third document attached hereto is a portion of one of the appendices to the Starr Report, the Office of Independent Counsel’s own history of the Paula Jones litigation. Starr was seeking more evidence against the President, any way he could, and he immunized Broaddrick to protect her from any prosecution for perjury if she now changed her story. Voila! She did, disavowing her sworn affidavit and sworn deposition testimony. We don’t have a copy of the OIC’s April 8, 1998 interview with her, although it’s cited on page 58 of the history. As you see, the OIC states that Broaddrick told the OIC that her affidavit was false. This document is public." 

Juanita Broaddrick has good reason to fear for her life which she has stated several times. I would not be surprised if she was coerced with threats of violence to recant her sworn affidavit. Any sane person does not doubt her claims. 

I believe this email is clear evidence that the Clinton Campaign had a great fear that these women would turn up to make sure Bill Clinton was exposed as a rapist and to torpedo a Hillary Clinton Presidency. It proves that they have been discussing these women since at least January 2016 and most likely before that. 

David Kendall finishes the email with:

"Please let me know if there’s anything else I can provide about this slimefest. 
 Best, David 
 *David E. Kendall* 
 *Williams & Connolly LLP* "


Please Share This Article!!!!